1. Anderson A. The European project semester: A useful teaching method in engineering education project approaches to learning in engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education. 2012; 8:15–28.
2. Khodaparast Haghi A. New perspectives in engineering education: the promotion of traditional models to innovative solutions. Journal of Engineering Education. 2005; 7(28):11–22. Persian.
3. Shim SH. A philosophical investigation of the role of teacher: A synthesis of Plato, Confucius, blubber and freire. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2008; 24(3): 515–35.
4. Dooge J. Engineering training and education. Dublin: Collins Press; 2007.
5. Yash Pal S, editor. , editor. Report of the Committee to Advice on Renovation and Rejuvenation of Higher Education. National Seminar on Quality, Expansion and Inclusion in Indian Higher Education; 2009 Feb 3-4; Calicut. Calicut: India; 2009. p. 1-8. Available from: [http://www.hindu.com/nic/yashpal committee report. ]
6. Aghamolaei T, Shirazi M, Dadgaran I, Shahsavari H, Ghanbarnezhad A. Health students’ expectations of the ideal educational environment: a qualitative research. Journal of Advances in Medical Education and Professionalism. 2014; 2(4):151–7.[PMC free article][PubMed]
7. Creswell JW. Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. Sydney: Merrill Prentice Hall; 2011.
8. Guba EG. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries. ECTJ. 1981; 29(2):75–91.
9. Faghihi SA, Khankeh HR, Hossini SJ, Arabshahi SKS, Faghihi Z, Parikh SV, et al. Improving continuing medical education by enhancing interactivity: lessons from Iran. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism. 2016; 4(2): 54.[PMC free article][PubMed]
10. Momeni Danaei SH, Zarshenas L, Oshagh M, Omid Khoda M. Which method of teaching would be better; cooperative or lecture. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2010;11(1): 24–31. Persian.
11. Noroozi HM, Mohsenizadeh M, Jafari Sani H, Ebrahimzadeh S. The effect of teaching using a blend of collaborative and mastery of learning models, on learning of vital signs: An experiment on nursing and operation room students of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2011; 11(5):541–53. Persian.
12. Zarshenas L, Momeni Danaei Sh, Oshagh M, Salehi P. Problem based learning: an experience of a new educational method in dentistry. Iranian Journal of Medical Education. 2010; 10(2): 171–9. Persian.
13. Brason J. Speaking at the Balanced Scorecard Collaborative Conference on Human Capital. Florida: Naples; 2002.
14. Klug J, Bruder S, Kelava A, Spiel C, Schmitz B. Diagnostic competence of teachers: A process model that accounts for diagnosing learning behavior tested by means of a case scenario. Teaching and Teacher Education. 2013; 30: 38–46.
15. Glover J, Browning RH. Translated by Kharrazi, Educational Psychology: Its Application and Principles. Tehran: The academic publishing; 2007.
16. Choi DG, Vries HJ. Standardization as emerging content in technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 2011; 21(1):111–35.
17. Byun JI, Ryu K, Cervero RM. What is really important in adult education program planning: challenge to collaboration and partnership in programs for the marginalized in learning cities in Korea. KEDI Journal of Educational Policy. 2009; 6(1): 3–23.
18. Khnyfr H. The higher education system in the world with strategy. Journal of Cultural Management. 2005; 3(9): 10.
19. Lin X, Luo H, Wu H. Educational Model Innovating and Capability Improving Mechanism of Engineering Education Based on CDIO. Creative Education. 2012; 3: 93–6.
20. Macsuga Gage AS, Simonsen B, Briere DE. Effective teaching practices that promote a positive classroom environment. Beyond Behavior. 2012; 22(1): 14–22.
21. Hadavand S. Ten effective Commandments in evaluation of training programs. Monthly Management. 2008; 15: 133–4.
22. Lynch DJ. Confronting challenges: Motivational beliefs and learning strategies in difficult college courses. College Student Journal. 2008;42:416–21.
23. Knapper Ch. Changing teaching practice: strategies and barriers. Paper presented at Taking stock: Symposium on teaching and learning research in higher education, 2008 April 25; Ontario. Ontario: Canada; 2008.
We’ve updated this post with some newer, more useful and up-to-date information. Check out 5 New Teaching Methods Improving Education!
By Sonia Jackson
The traditional “chalk and talk” method of teaching that’s persisted for hundreds of years is now acquiring inferior results when compared with the more modern and revolutionary teaching methods that are available for use in schools today. Greater student interaction is encouraged, the boundaries of authority are being broken down, and a focus on enjoyment over grades is emphasised.
As teachers, it’s necessary to be able to teach and remain engaging. It puts a greater level of responsibility on creating lesson plans that truly work. Here are three teaching methods that are making an impact.
Teachers have reported amazing results when it came to spaced learning. Spaced Learning is a learning method in which the condensed learning content is repeated three times, with two 10-minute breaks during which activities such as physical activities are performed by the students – I think, that PE and lessons can be combined.
Spaced learning involves encouraging students to quickly switch through activities. For example, providing ten minutes of knowledge on the nervous system with a PowerPoint presentation and then having 15 minutes of basketball would be the way to get the better grades.
The results don’t lie and the creators of the system at Monkseaton High School in Tyne and Wear have reported that it does work. They claim that it’s more effective than simply teaching students by utilising traditional methods for four hours.
The key is in the brain cells. It helps them to create the connections that they need to actually remember the knowledge. Furthermore, it has the additional benefit of allowing people to relax. If they are compressing sections of the syllabus into such small sections then there’s no time to worry. It’s all about the learning before moving on to another session of activity.
Sometimes conventional lesson blocks just don’t work as every student is different and they all have their problematic subjects. The concept of Flexible Fridays is that an in-depth session of a subject can be acquired by simply having a whole day of mathematics or some other subject.
At Flexible Fridays lessons a teacher try to help each student to study and learn what is the most difficult for him/her personally. Somebody repeats, somebody learns. It makes it more convenient for students as now they can focus on one thing while in school. It means that students don’t have a breaking point by spending hours struggling with a subject along at home.
Teachers also find it easier as they can keep their lesson plans and simply go over them again with a more personal touch. Flexible Friday lessons are more in-touch with students and gives focused study time that can help students grasp difficult concepts.
Teachers are also able to aid students by simply having fast-track weeks. Having a whole week of mathematics or English can help students to get through the subjects in a shorter amount of time.
It’s good news for teachers and students alike because even though a lesson lasts an hour it could actually lose up to 25 percent of its designated time. There’s the preparing for class and packing away to take into account, and students are not always the quickest at performing these tasks.
Teacher should choose what method is more appropriate for his/her students: spaced learning or Flexible Fridays.
Under a new teaching method called “engagement” students are urged to engage with the real world, analyse everything that happens in different life spheres (not only internship but also economical, business, social spheres, etc.). Business studies are where this new focus of engagement occurred at the Leasowes Community College in Dudley.
Instead of conventional teaching methods, students were taken to visit local businesses where they were able to witness how the knowledge that they were learning applied to the real world.
Multiple days were set aside for this practice and all students were required to wear business suits in order to attend. The idea is to get students engaged and to connect their learning to the real world. If teachers can show them how what they are teaching connects to the real world then their own brain cells are going to connect them and associate them.
The results are there for all to see because before this new method was introduced only 40 percent of students achieved grades of A-C across both years 10 and 11. Under the new teaching method the institution reported that the numbers had shot up to a massive 91 percent of students achieving A-Cs in years 10 and year 11.
New methods of teaching have the purpose to improve the quality of education and involve students in educational process. Innovations mean a progress and development.
Sonia Jackson writes for www.custom-essay-writing.org.
Photo Courtesy of BigStock.