Highlight, copy & paste to cite:
Chew, J. (2004). Managing MNC Expatriates through Crises: A Challenge for International Human Resource Management, Research and Practice in Human Resource Management, 12(2), 1-30.
Managing MNC Expatriates through Crises: A Challenge for International Human Resource Management
International crises experienced by multinational corporations include both the premature return of expatriates due to failed assignments and the poor retention of returned expatriates due to failed repatriation. To reduce the direct and indirect costs inherent with expatriate failure, multinational corporations are striving to improve their capability to manage their expatriates before, during and after international assignments. This article highlights these issues and discusses the challenges for human resource professionals when managing expatriates. The results of the study presented in this paper suggest that the management of international human resources is increasingly being acknowledged as a major determinant of success or failure in international business. It concludes by proposing that a well-managed and proactive response to an international crisis may help an organisation retain experienced international employees.
As organisations become globalised, there is an increasing challenge to use expatriates on international assignments to complete strategically critical tasks (Gregersen & Black 1996, Brewster 1998, Downes & Thomas 1999). Multinational corporations (MNCs) use expatriates, not only for corporate control and expertise reasons in vital global markets, but also to facilitate entry into new markets or to develop international management competencies (Bird & Dunbar 1991, Boyacigiller 1991, Rosenzweig 1994, Shaffer, Harrison & Gilley 1999, Forster 2000).
While it is recognised that Human Resource Management (HRM) problems are more complex in the international environment, there is also increased evidence to suggest that the management of international human resources is increasingly being acknowledged as a major determinant of success or failure in international business (Tung 1984, Dowling 1999, Hiltrop 1999). For renowned and established MNCs, failure to be able to communicate and coordinate their activities in international business has the potential to plunge them into a crisis. The crises confronting MNCs include failed assignments due to premature return of expatriates and the loss of their returned expatriates due to poor repatriation. These crises, due to poor expatriate management, can, therefore, threaten the organisation’s performance and capabilities in the international arena.
Hence, to avoid a crisis in expatriate management is threefold. The first challenge for international human resource is planning effectively for the selection of expatriates for overseas assignments. The second, return of expatriates has to be attended and the subsequent job assignment for returned expatriate in their home country is a priority for managerial attention. Essentially, the primary crisis management roles of international human resource (IHR) professionals are those of record custodian, crisis management team member, communicator, and contributing writer to the emergency plan (Williamson 1991). This multifaceted role of IHR includes providing professional counselling to help employees and their families to deal with the psychological problems associated with a hostage or an evacuation situation, to concentrate on the well-being of their workforce, but they also addressed compensation and benefits issues, reassignment issues, legal issues, health, safety, and security issues.
It is widely acknowledged in the relevant literature (Smith & Sipika 1993, Hickman & Crandall 1997, Coombs 2001) that the process of crisis management entails three main phases. These phases are conceptualised as (1) Preparedness, which is the period of preparing plans and procedures for addressing a crisis; (2) Responsiveness, or the actual dealing with the crisis; and (3) Recovery, during which the organisation returns to normal operations as quickly as possible. These three phases are considered as sequential phenomena in a continuous cycle so that the Recovery phase, which follows the Responsiveness phase, also precedes the Preparedness phase. In this paper, the Responsiveness of expatriate crisis management is delineated in an auto reflective narrative design that utilised the responses of 15 expatriate managers. The data provided by the managers are considered within the frameworks of the Recovery phase and the Preparedness phase to reinforce how corporate HRM policies and practices might facilitate better management of the expatriate crises.
Managing Expatriate Crises
International crises experienced by MNCs include premature return of their expatriates due to failed assignments and poor retention of their returned expatriates due to failed repatriation. Researchers have analysed the causes of failure in overseas assignments and have introduced Human Resource (HR) practices that would help organisations to select, develop, and retain competent expatriates (Oddou 1991, Arthur & Bennett 1995, Stroh, Gregersen & Black 1998, Hiltrop 1999, Riusala 2000, Varner 2002). Consequently, multinational corporations are striving to improve their capability in managing human resources internationally. Important features of these initiatives include (1) the nature and length of the planning for the selection and training of expatriates for overseas assignments, (2) the return of expatriate, and (3) the subsequent assigned work for these repatriates in the home country (Punnett & Ricks 1997, Anderson 2001, Lazarova 2001).
Failed Assignments due to Premature Return of Expatriates
A prominent concern in the international recruitment and selection literature is that of expatriate failure (Adler 1981, Mendenhall & Oddou 1991, Feldman & Tompson 1993, Harvey 1993, Riusala 2000). This expatriate failure becomes an international crisis for the MNC. Several studies have identified the reasons behind the failure. For instance, premature return of expatriates and the lack of cross-cultural adjustment by expatriates, their spouse or family are some identified features (Black & Gregersen 1991, Black 1992, Shaffer et al. 1999, Riusala 2000) as well as poor performance (Fieldman & Thomas 1992, Stening & Hammer 1992, Feldman & Tompson 1993, Hodgetts 1993, Naumann 1993, Clark, Grant & Heijltjes 2000) that can arise during an international assignment. Indeed, research conducted by Black and Gregersen (1997) indicates that 10 to 20 per cent of United States (U.S.) expatriates sent overseas return prematurely due to dissatisfaction with their job or the impact of culture shock. And one-third of those who stayed for the duration did not perform satisfactory to the expectations of their organisations. Moreover, when an international assignment is not completed, necessitating the replacement of the expatriate (Bird & Dunbar 1991, Swaak 1995, Pucik & Saba 1998), the costs of failure to the MNCs are both direct and indirect. The direct cost includes salary, training costs, and travel and relocation expenses. The indirect cost could be a loss of market share, difficulties with host government and demands that parent country nationals be replaced with host country nationals (Dowling, Schuler & Welch 1994, Stone 1994, Forster 2000).
Expatriate failure is primarily caused by error in selection (Adler 1981, Tung 1981, Arthur & Bennet 1995, Harvey & Noviceivic 2001). Historically, the selection of expatriates has been based on technical competence (Katz & Seifer 1996), neglecting other important interpersonal factors of expatriates (Mendenhall, Dunbar & Oddou 1987, Suutari & Brewster 1998). For instance, Clarke and Hammer (1995) found that interpersonal skills assist in the cultural adjustment of the expatriate and his or her family is a managerial function worthy of greater consideration. A review of extant literature on expatriate selection identified other essential traits as predictors of expatriate success and these are addressed.
Nature of Planning: Expatriate Selection
Within the abundant research on expatriate managers, certain selection characteristics or traits have been identified as predictors of expatriate success. These include technical ability, managerial skills, cultural empathy, adaptability, diplomacy, language ability, positive attitude, emotional stability, maturity and adaptability of family. One of the earliest reports was provided by Tung (1987), who examined expatriate selection practices across 80 U.S. MNCs, and subsequently, identified four general categories which may contribute to expatriate success. These are broadly described as (1) technical competence on the job, (2) personality traits or relational abilities, (3) environmental variables, and (4) family situation. This is further supported by Ronen’s (1989) model that incorporates the dimensions of expatriate success identified by Tung (1981). Ronen (1989), describes five categories of attributes of success: (1) job factors, (2) relational dimensions, (3) motivational state (4) family situation, and (5) language skills. The five categories and their specific aspects are outlined in Table 1.
|Job Factors||Relational Dimensions||Motivational State||Family Situation||Language Skills|
|Technical skills||Tolerance for ambiguity||Belief in the mission||Willingness of spouse to live abroad||Host country language|
|Familiarity with host country and headquarters operations||Behavioural flexibility||Congruence with career path||Adaptive and supportive spouse||Non verbal communication|
|Managerial skills||Non-judgementalism||Interest in overseas experience||Stable marriage|
|Administrative competence||Cultural empathy and low ethnocentrism||Interest in specific host country culture|
|Interpersonal skills||Willingness to acquire new patterns of behavior and attitudes|
Source: Ronen, S. 1989, Training the International Assignee. Training and Career Development (1st ed), San Francisco: Goldstein.
Ronen (1989) identified these five selection attributes (Table 1) as contributing to greater expatriate success in international assignments as compared to the customary selection of expatriates based solely on technical abilities. This paper reports the findings of a study which examined the selection categories of fifteen organisations. This study employed Ronen’s (1989) model as a template for the effective selection of expatriates.
Nature of Planning: Pre-departure Training
Once an employee has been selected, pre-departure training becomes the next critical step in attempting to ensure the expatriate’s effectiveness and success abroad (Mendenhall et al. 1987). Career counselling for the spouse is becoming necessary because the dual career dilemma is becoming more important, especially with the increase of women in the workforce (Collins 1996). Given the difficulties of re-entry, expatriates and their families need help to readjust back into their home country. The two most important issues are (1) career planning and (2) ‘reverse culture shock’ (Hammer, Hart & Rogan 1998). To assist the expatriate and family to readapt to work and life in general and to help overcome reverse culture shock, re-entry training such as counselling workshops and career development consultations prove useful in the adjustment process (Sievers 1998).
Cross-cultural adjustment has been defined as “the degree of psychological comfort with various aspects of a host country” (Black & Gregersen 1991: 680). For expatriates unfamiliar with the customs, cultures and work habits of the local people, pre-departure training may be critical to their effectiveness and success in their overseas assignments (Mendenhall et al. 1987, Black 1992, Weech 2001). It is also important to include the family in these training programs. Extensive studies indicate that training is beneficial in reducing expatriates’ perceived need to adjust (Deshpande & Viswesvaran 1991, Latta 1999).
A survey conducted by Windham International and the National Foreign Trade Council (1999), revealed that a large number of international assignments are turned down or interrupted because of spouse and family issues. The survey’s respondents cited family adjustment (65%), spousal resistance (53%) and spouse’s career (45%) as the most critical roadblocks to acceptance and success of international assignments. Substantial research (Harvey 1985, Black & Gregersen 199l, Bonache & Brewster 2001) specifies that if the expatriate’s spouse and/or family members are having trouble adjusting abroad, the expatriate will have problems as well, including poor job performance, which could result in an early return from the overseas assignment.
Mendenhall et al. (1987) distinguish between three types of training, namely, (1) information giving approaches, which have a relatively low level of rigour; (2) affective approaches which address people’s feelings as well as ‘facts’; and (3) immersion approaches which are in-depth methods covering a broad range of topics and methods. These training programs are designed to improve relational skills which are crucial to effective performance in expatriate job assignments. Figure 1 illustrates the types of cross cultural training programs in ascending order of rigour.
Training is described as the process of altering employee behaviour and attitudes to increase the probability of goal attainment (Hodgetts 1993). As depicted in Figure 1, the provision of a more comprehensive (high rigour) cross culture training will increase the social support that the expatriate and family need (i.e., in country support). This intensive training can provide the encouragement and motivation to seek the social network and activities that will make the new stressors more bearable. For the expatriate, training can reduce many of the uncertainties associated with the new role.
The Return of Expatriates
One of the hidden costs linked with expatriation is the inability to retain the expatriate upon return to the home country (Black & Gregersen 1997, Downes & Thomas 1999). Several research findings (Adler 1991, Solomon 1995; Hammer et al. 1998) indicate that 25 per cent of employees, who complete overseas assignments want to leave their company on their return. It has been determined that the cost of losing a single repatriated employee has been estimated to be as high as $1.2 million (Black 1992, Shaffer et al. 1999, Forster 2000). Furthermore, evidence reported by Stroh et al. (1998) suggests organisations investing in international career development plans for their expatriates are more likely to have lower rates of repatriate turnover than those without such plans.
The preparedness phase of crisis management has relevance for better preparing expatriates for homecoming. Repatriation programs that assist in the development of organisational policy and job definition for repatriates combined with financial and career counselling and family orientation are initiatives that can be implemented as part of the overall process of career development and international human resource management (Black 1992, Swaak 1997, Tung 1998a, Hauser 1999). Failure to address repatriation problems may lead to disillusionment and high turnover (Mendenhall & Oddou 1991, Engen 1995, Tung 1998b, Haines & Saba 1999).
Source: Mendenhall, Dunbar & Oddou, 1987: 340.
Therefore, the challenge for organisations is to view repatriation as reverse expatriation, posing many of the same problems and warranting many of the same solutions (Swaak 1997).
Successful assignments begin with repatriation planning at the time of expatriation (Latta 1999). Several researchers (Frazee 1997, Allen & Alvarez 1998) suggested that at the onset of an overseas assignment a repatriation agreement should be determined between the employee and the employer in order to develop a repatriation process to help manage the employee’s goals and expectations. The elements of a repatriation agreement are very likely to include provision of a specified period of the assignment and a return incentive payment. On return, the expatriate should have an assurance of a job that is mutually acceptable (i.e., one equal to or better than the one held before leaving), and a provision of re-entry training combined with a repatriation program to support the repatriate and help the family readjust back into their home country. Relocation benefits such as arranging pre-repatriation home country ‘house hunting’, school registration and the shipment of personal goods, would further reduce the problems associated with a return home (Downes & Thomas 1997, Frazee 1997, Allen & Alvarez 1998, Barton & Bishko 1998, Hammer et al. 1998).
According to Allen and Alvarez (1998), the effectiveness of a repatriation program rests on its ability to address the following questions: “Will I get a good job when I return? Will my career be enhanced and will my newly acquired skills and perspective be valued and well utilised in the home organisation?” (1998: 33). Repatriation programs which are likely to be based on knowledge acquired from the responsiveness phase of an organisational crisis, consist of activities that provide a comparable position or a promotion from the job held before repatriation and assistance for the employee and family in assimilating back into their home culture, these programs are crucial in demonstrating supportiveness to the returnees (Peltonen 1998). These repatriation strategies are likely to improve repatriation success rates by emphasising the commitment of the organisation to its expatriate staff (Allen & Alvarez 1998) and may encourage expatriates to feel that their best interests were a priority, leading to enhanced expatriate commitment to the parent firm. In addition, it helps to develop commitment to the new local work unit, thereby facilitating the retention of these strategic human resources (Black 1992).
The study reported in this paper, focused on the effective management of expatriates in their selection, preparation (nature and length of planning, expatriate agreement), support (repatriation agreement & programs) and repatriation. The qualitative approach was adopted to allow a richer generation of data and providing a closer analysis of issues from the company’s perspectives.
Participants and Site
The sample population of this research was drawn from 30 human resource managers or human resource representatives of corporations in Western Australia. The respondents interviewed consisted of nine HR managers, four HR specialists, one business service manager and one administration officer. Sixty per cent of the respondents were females. Using the guidelines provided by the Who’s Who of Australia (2001), large organisations were selected if they (1) had revenue of greater than $4.4 million annually, (2) employed more than 44 people, (3) were publicly listed, and (4) incorporated two or more overseas branches. Industry sectors represented by these organisations were mining, energy, oil, gas, engineering, construction, electronics, computer, food, and retail, financial and manufacturing. Fifteen of the thirty companies responded positively to the request, indicating a response rate of 50 per cent. Companies that accepted came mainly from the resource sector such as mining, oil, gas, chemicals, energy, and engineering and diversified industries.
The research procedure involved interviewing human resource managers or their representatives in 15 Western Australian companies, using a structured interview questionnaire which incorporated a checklist of expatriation and repatriation practices. These questions were based on the best practices identified through the literature search (e.g., pre-departure training approaches, selection criteria, re-entry success). This strategy enabled respondents to reflect on their experiences and observations of the appropriateness of HRM practices and polices to prepare and train expatriates for the responsiveness phase of organisational crises (i.e., expatriate management).
All potential respondents were initially sent a letter and a consent agreement requesting their participation and assuring them that all materials gathered from this study would be treated with the strictest confidence. No reference will be made to any organisation or individual and the information will be reported in an anonymous form.
The interview schedule explored three key issues on expatriate management: (1) expatriate selection process (i.e., criteria of successful selection), (2) expatriate preparation (i.e., pre-departure and cross culture training), and (3) repatriation career management/assistance (i.e., mentoring before, during and after the assignment; insuring a comparable job upon re-entry).
Responses to most questions were captured on a dichotomous Yes or No, checklist style answer format or as open-ended responses.
The data from the interviews were content analysed. Once the interview data were collected, the tapes were transcribed and data coded. Coding involved the labelling of concepts from the text relevant to the research problem. The aim was to move from a set of unstructured data (participant’s accounts), to a collection of theoretical codes, concepts and interpretations. This approach dealt with the analysis of the broad ‘themes and content of participant’s accounts’.
Emergent themes were ranked by their frequency of mention, and finally, categorised into x fields. The computer package used for this qualitative analysis is QSR NUD*IST (Non-numerical Unstructured Data Indexing Searching and Theorising) (Weitzman & Miles 1995). The qualitative research process is known as the Grounded Approach (Denzin & Lincoln 1998).
The results of this study were summarised in three major sections which parallel the research foci of expatriate management. Responses to the asked questions will be reported in the three categories of (1) expatriate selection process, (2) expatriate preparation (pre-departure training), and (3) repatriation process.
Expatriate Selection Process
The results of the interviews indicate that the majority of the respondents (87%) still placed extreme importance on the technical competence of their expatriates, with (47%) acknowledging personality traits, relational abilities and motivational state to be highly important criteria. Overall, the participating companies considered the family situation as moderately important, language skills as somewhat unimportant and prior expatriate experience as moderately unimportant. Therefore, the value of language skills and prior overseas experience was dismissed by respondents as relatively unimportant in the area of selection. However, it was noted that previous overseas experience reduced the need for orientation.
Responses from the interviews suggest that technical expertise and domestic track record are by far the two most dominant selection criteria of these participating firms. Factors such as language skills and international adaptability are of decreased significance. However, it is important to note that almost half of the respondents did place a high emphasis on the cultural and adaptability demands of offshore assignments. These results show that there is a growing recognition of the importance of human relational abilities. In fact, several respondents also acknowledged the greater impact of cross-national assignments on spouse and family than on expatriates.
With regards to the importance of family situation, the majority of the respondents still regarded family situation as only moderately important in the selection criterion. However, several respondents did acknowledge that the family situation was often responsible for the expatriate’s inability to function effectively in a foreign environment.
In terms of pre-departure training for expatriate assignments, the interviewees noted that although they consider training as essential, the high costs associated with expatriation reduced their capacity to provide formal training for expatriation. Respondents tended to believe that ‘Training is important, but the cost benefit must be considered’ (interviewee 6). Generally, most of the participants indicated that the level of pre-departure training provided depended very much on the cost and the benefit obtained from running such programs (interviewees 4, 15). As a result, they (i.e., interviewees 1, 4, 15) tend to rely on indirect forms of training, such as notes for guidance and the provision of an internet information web-site.
These respondents also noted that their companies considered other forms of preparation to be more cost effective. These preparatory initiatives included ‘flying the employee and family over to location to check out if they would like to stay’ (interviewee 3). The relevance of briefings and shadowing of current incumbents was also highlighted by the respondents. Indeed, these were more frequent practices than the provision of formal training programs. Interviewee four indicated that this company used the ‘immersion approach’ (Figure 1) to a limited extent for some countries where expatriates must be fluent in language. In this situation, they provide extensive training. This respondent added that the expertise of the expatriate also determines the type of training. For example, engineers and scientists would not receive the immersion approach, whilst sales and marketing would need this more intensive training. According to these respondents, certain jobs (e.g., marketing) require greater interpersonal relationship with host country nationals. In contrast, Tung (1988a) indicated it depends on other factor such as length of stay and degree of engagement. Most study participants agreed that the degree of expected interaction and similarity between the home and host cultures would predict the use of the cross-cultural training method by their employee and his/her family (interviewees 3, 8, 10). Interviewee two noted that training would be provided for all family members for countries that are culturally different. Some of the respondents (interviewees 3, 5) recognised that all families who could not speak the language would feel isolated, and, therefore, the language survival briefing should also include the wife and children of the expatriate. On the whole, most companies recognised the need for pre-departure training for their expatriate and family, but the extent and coverage are driven by the cost considerations. This primarily resulted in the adoption of less intensive training.
The study results show that the majority (87%) of the participating firms provided a specific length of posting (average of 3 years). None of the identified companies’ offered return incentive payments. The majority (87%) of the firms offered their expatriates a mutually acceptable position on their return from an assignment. Notably a large number (87%) of these companies did not provide any re-entry training for their returned expatriates, but did provide shipment of goods (87%), and relocation benefits (67%). The majority of the interviewees indicated that their companies provided repatriation programs but not in a formalised form.
Six of the companies (40%) promoted more than half of their expatriates on their return home. In terms of higher responsibility without promotion for their repatriates, only five companies offered their returned expatriates with such a position. These expatriates were only a small minority of the total sample. Moreover, generally, all companies reassigned their returned expatriates to a comparable or mutually acceptable position. Furthermore, it was acknowledged by eight respondents that in their firms (53%) nearly ten per cent of returning expatriates left the company within six months of their return homecoming.
The repatriation programs explored in this study consisted of ten effective strategies cited in the literature as facilitating expatriates’ return to their home country (Black 1992, Fieldman & Thomas 1992, Frazee 1997, Allen & Alvarez 1998). Overall, the results indicated that the majority of companies provided no separate organisational unit for their repatriates, no facilitator to identify expatriate new knowledge, no event to welcome expatriate and family home, no post assignment interview, and no career-counselling workshop for expatriate and family. A majority of the companies admitted to the occasional use of a mentorship program, relocation benefits and the utilisation of repatriates as trainers. However, most companies did provide the shipment of personal goods and a HR service to support the career tracking of their expatriates. Many of the study respondents acknowledged the lack of adoption of the ten strategic repatriation programs explored in the research and stated that the reasons were due to cost, and were unaware of the existence of these repatriation programs. Some of the other respondents reported that the repatriation programs they offered were not formalised as a policy, but carried out as an ad hoc practice. It must be noted that when asked, the majority of these companies acknowledged that the spouse and the family readjustment were given little attention. The results of this study suggest that companies fail to plan for the repatriation of their expatriates.
Failed Assignments - Premature Return
Premature return refers to the return of expatriates before the completion of their international assignment due to several reasons: poor performance, job dissatisfaction, cultural shock and family dissatisfaction (Harvey 1985, McDonald 1993). The non-completion of the international assignment necessitates the replacement of the expatriate (Bird & Dunbar 1991). Consequently, the expatriate failure is costly and results in a crisis for the multinational corporation. The results of the study showed that the majority (67%) of the respondents admitted that up to five per cent of their expatriates returned prematurely from their assignments, six per cent acknowledged ten per cent expatriate failure and 13 per cent of the participating firms confirm that 25 per cent of their expatriates return prematurely.
A high proportion of the participating firms indicated that their expatriates generally return home for family reasons or personal reasons (interviewees 4, 6, 8). Family situation was suggested as playing the critical role in the premature return of expatriates. This was particularly noted by one respondent (interviewee 3) who reported that his company had conducted in depth studies on the adjustment of their expatriates’ wives in a foreign environment because of the frequency of these expatriates themselves.
Failed Repatriation - Turnover Intention
More than half the respondents acknowledged that ten per cent of their expatriates are likely to leave the organisation within six months after their return from their overseas assignments. Some of the reasons cited for leaving included family reasons and feelings of loss of autonomy and authority, loss of career direction and promotional opportunities, and a feeling that the company undervalues their international experience.
In terms of promotion for returned expatriates, six of the respondents indicated that nearly half of their returned expatriates were promoted to a senior post and 47 per cent of the respondents acknowledged that half of their returned expatriates were given a comparable position. Over 50 per cent of the participating organisations provided their returned expatriates with expanded responsibilities, without recognition of formal promotion.
The results of this study show that the key cause for the premature return of expatriates from overseas assignments was related to concerns that were articulated as family reasons. This evidence supports previous studies on expatriate failure indicating the inability of the spouse to adapt to the foreign environment as the frequent cause of the early return of the expatriate (Tung 1987, Forster 2000). Clearly, a major challenge for Australian companies is to develop institutional mechanisms that heighten priority on family adaptability in their selection criteria. A strong inference of the study evidence is that without appropriate arrangements there is a high likelihood of continuing expatriate failures.
This study also identified some significant issues for expatriate management. First, although the majority of organisations in this study recognised the importance of the role of spouse and family, this was not reflected in the corporations’ selection process and repatriation policies and practices. This low consideration for an employee’s spouse and family can be attributed to emphases by the multinationals to minimise costs in the HRM practices. Second, the study evidence confirms that in the selection process, the assessed Australian companies continue to rank technical competence as highly important. Several studies (Dowling et al. 1994, Selmer 2000, Harvey & Novicevic 2001), have concluded that technical competence in a field, although one of the dominant bases for selection, has very little to do with the ability to adapt to new cultures, deal effectively with co-workers, or to adopt foreign behavioural norms. Moreover, the value of language skills and prior overseas experience was dismissed by respondents as relatively unimportant in the area of selection, although, the respondents noted that previous overseas experience reduced the need for orientation. According to Coyle (1996), from a management perspective, once an employee has previous overseas experience, and is classified as a career expatriate, there is a tendency for companies to minimise the material and counselling support given before and after the move. In contrast, Black and Gregersen (1991) argued that the extent of previous experience does not necessarily seem to ensure success in current overseas assignment. Clearly, this study revealed that the involved Australian companies are gradually making a shift towards placing greater relevance on personality traits, relational abilities and motivational state.
Third, the dual career dilemma was acknowledged by respondents as an emerging problem that can affect career development plans for international employees. From the information given by the respondents it appears that most of their companies recognised the issue of the dual career couple, but are still unsure how to manage the problem in relevant HRM policies and practices. A previous study by Coyle (1996) echoed similar findings. In anticipation of such a trend continuing, it is suggested that organisations might be encourage to implement a career counselling program for the spouses of their expatriates.
Fourth, pre-departure training involving cross-cultural training has long been advocated as a means of facilitating effective cross-cultural transfer (Black & Mendenhall 1990), yet few firms endorse such HRM practices. The main reason appears to be that top management simply does not believe that the training is necessary or effective (Jackson 1995, Sanchez, Spector & Cooper 2000). Cross-cultural training programs are considered costly and time consuming. Lack of time was another reason why these companies failed to provide adequate pre-departure training and language training.
A fifth important finding of this study was evidence which suggests that the majority of firms do not use comprehensive cross cultural training programs, This is especially in terms of the ‘immersion’ and ‘affective’ approaches. The value of providing a comprehensive training program for expatriates is demonstrated by the low turnover rates among management personnel in European and Japanese multinationals (Tung 1987). Previous studies revealed that other forms of preparation for example, briefings, shadowing and preliminary visits are more frequently used than formal training programs (Scullion 1991, Brewster & Pickard 1994) and considered by management to be cost-effective.
Finally, the results of the study indicated that although the participating organisations recognise repatriation as an important aspect of international human resource management, very few support systems were provided for their expatriates in coping with the many difficulties associated with re-entry, including culture shock and possible ‘career stagnation’. Clearly, there were many gaps in the repatriation programs provided by Australian companies for their returned expatriates and there is a need to address this deficiency. These results, although small in size, support previous research conducted on American MNCs (Black 1992). It concludes that from the expatriate’s perspective, problems associated with re-integration into the home country are loss of status, loss of autonomy, loss of career direction and promotional opportunities, and a feeling that the company undervalues their international experience. A salient message from this type of research is that a comprehensive examination of the Responsiveness Phase of a crisis (i.e., the existence of catastrophe or institutional disasters), unequivocally exposes the shortcomings of current HRM problems and practices that are being implemented to redress the crisis, and furthermore, this information provides for revisiting the Preparedness Phase, and even the Recovery Phase of inevitable future crises.
The evidence of the study reported in this paper reinforced a well-stated axiom that every firm should try to prevent a crisis from occurring. The crises confronting MNCs include failed assignments due to premature return of expatriates and the loss of their returned expatriates due to poor repatriation. Crises in expatriate management can substantially threaten a firm’s capabilities and performance in the host country. Additionally, the high attrition rate of repatriates is costly and creates a net negative return on a firm’s investment in human resource.
The results of the study indicated that repatriation must be planned carefully, from the time of expatriation when expatriate selection occurs. By putting in place suitable HR policies and procedures, an organisation can both, more efficiently manage human resource globally and encourage more employees to accept foreign transfers. This emphasis is a visible sign that the organisation supports expatriates and attempts to contribute to employee success in the overseas assignment. This Preparedness Phase will significantly increase the probability of successfully managing expatriate crisis situations because responsibilities and liabilities are clarified before the crisis happens. A well-managed and proactive response (Recovery and Preparedness Phases) to an expatriate management crisis may help a company retain experienced international employees and reduce the likelihood of public relations and legal problems in host country.
Janet Chew (PhD Murdoch) is a lecturer in the Curtin University of Technology School of Marketing. Her research interests are in international cross-cultural management, strategic policy, and in related areas in human resource management.
Adler, N. (1981). Re-entry: Managing cross-cultural transitions. Group and Organisational Studies, 6(3), 341-356.
Adler, N. (1991). International dimensions of organisational behaviour. Boston: PW-Kent.
Allen, D., & Alvarez, A. (1998). Empowering expatriates and organisations to improve repatriation effectiveness. Human Resource Planning Society, 21(4), 29-39.
Anderson, B. (2001). Expatriate management: An Australian tri-sector comparative study. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(1), 33-51.
Arthur, W., & Bennett, W. (1995). The international assignee: The relative importance of factors perceived to contribute to success. Personnel Psychology, 48(1), 99-115.
Barton, R., & Bishko, M. (1998). Global mobility strategy. HR Focus, 75 (3), 57-59.
Bird, A., & Dunbar, R. (1991). Getting the job done over there: Improving expatriate productivity. National Productivity Review, Spring, 145-156.
Black, J.S. (1992). Coming home: The relationship of expatriate expectations with repatriation adjustment and job performance. Human Relations, 45(2), 177-192.
Black, J.S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1991). When Yankees come home: Factors related to expatriate and spouse repatriating adjustment. International Business Studies, 22(3), 671-694.
Black, J.S., & Gregersen, H. B. (1997). The right way to manage expats. Harvard Business Review, 77 (2), 52-63.
Bonache, J., & Brewster, C. (2001). Knowledge transfer and the management of expatriation. Thunderbird International Business Review, 43(1), 145 -168.
Boyacigiller, N. (1991). International human resource management. In M.E. Mendenhall & G.R. Oddou (Eds.), The International Assignment Reconsidered. (148-155). Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing Company.
Brewster, C. (1998). International HRM: Beyond expatriation. Human Resource Management, 7(3), 31-42.
Brewster, C., & Pickard, J. (1994). Evaluating expatriate training. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 24(3), 18-29.
Clark, T., Grant, D., & Heijltjes, M. (2000). Researching comparative and international human resource management. International Studies of Management & Organisation, 29(4), 6-23.
Clarke, C., & Hammer, M.R. (1995). Predictors of Japanese and American managers’ job success. Personal adjustment, and Intercultural Interaction effectiveness. Management International Review, 35(2), 153-170.
Collins L.A. (1996). Managing globe-trotting expats. Management Review, 85(5), 38-44.
Coombs, W.T. (2001). Teaching the crisis management/communication course. Public Relations Review, 27(1), 89-101.
Coyle, W. (1996). Career expatriates become global troubleshooters. Human Resource Monthly, 5(6), 24.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Chicago: Sage Publications.
Dowling, P.J. (1999). Completing the Puzzle: Issues in the development of the field of international human resource management. Management International Review, 15, 27.
Dowling, P.J., Schuler, R.S., & Welch, D.S. (1994). International dimensions of human resource management. (2nd ed.), Belmont: Wadsworth Publicity Company.
Deshpande, S.P., & Viswesvaran, C. (1991). The Effectiveness of Cross-Cultural Training: A Meta-Analysis. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Academy of Management, Miami.
Downes, M., & Thomas A.S. (1999). Managing overseas assignments to build organisational knowledge. Human Resource Planning, 22 (4), 33-48.
Downes, M., & Thomas, A.T. (1997). Expatriation and Internationalisation: A Theoretical Linkage. Journal of International Management, (December), 323-349.
Engen J.R, 1995. Coming home. Training, 32(3), 37-40.
Feldman, D.C., & Tompson, H.B. (1993). Expatriation, repatriation, and domestic geographical relocation: An empirical Investigation of adjustment to new Job assignments. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(3), 507-529.
Fieldman, D.C., & Thomas, D.C. (1992). Career management issues facing expatriates. Journal of International Business, 23(2), 271-293.
Forster, N. (2000). Expatriates and the impact of cross cultural training. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(3), 63-78.
Frazee,V.(1997). Research points to weaknesses in expatriate policy. Workforce 3(1), 9.
Gregersen, H.B., & J.S. Black (1996). Multiple commitments upon repatriation: Japanese Experience. Journal of Management, 22(2), 209-230.
Hammer, M., Hart, W., & Rogan, R. (1998). Can you go home again? An analysis of the repatriation of corporate managers and spouses. Management International Review, 38(1), 67-86.
Haines III, V.Y., & Saba, T. (1999).Understanding reactions to international mobility policies and practices. Human Resource Planning, 22 (3), 40-52.
Harvey, M.G. (1985). The executive family: An overlooked variable to international assignments. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20(1), 84-92.
Harvey, M.G. (1993). A survey of corporate programs for managing terrorist threats. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(3), 465-479.
Harvey, M., & Novicevic, M. (2001). Selecting expatriates for increasingly complex global assignments. Career Development International, 6(2), 69-86.
Hauser J, (1999). Managing expatriates careers. HR Focus, 76 (2), 11.
Hodgetts, R.M. (1993). Modern human relations at work (5th ed.), Hinsdale, IL: Dryden Press.
Hickman, J.R., & Crandall, W.R. (1997). Before disaster hits: A multifactor approach to crisis management. Business Horizons, (March/April), 75-79.
Hiltrop, J.M. (1999). The use of HRM practices in international and domestic organisations, New Zealand of Industrial Relations, 24(1): 47-61.
Jackson, T. (1995). Cross cultural management. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
Katz, J.P., & Seifer, D.M. (1996). It’s a different world out there: Planning for expatriate success through selection, pre-departure training and on site socialisation. Human Resource Planning, 19(2), 32-49.
Latta, G. (1999). Expatriate policy and practice: A ten-year comparison of trends. Compensation and Benefits Review, 31(4), 35-39.
Lazarova, M. (2001). Retaining repatriates: The role of organizational support practices, Journal of World Business, 36(4), 389-401.
McDonald, G. (1993). ET go home? The successful management of expatriate transfers. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 8(2), 18-29.
Mendenhall, M., Dunbar, E., & Oddou, G. (1987). Expatriate selection, training and career pathing: A review critique. Human Resource Management, 26(3), 331-345.
Mendenhall, M., & Oddou, G. (1991). International human resource management. Boston: PWS-Kent Publishing.
Naumann, E. (1993). Organisational predictors of expatriate job satisfaction. Journal of International Business Studies, 10(1), 61-80.
Oddou, G. (1991). Managing your expatriates: What the successful firms do. Human Resource Planning, 14(4), 301-309.
Peltonen, T. (1998). Repatriation and career systems: Finnish public and private sector repatriates in their career lines. In C. Brewster & H. Harris (Eds.), International HRM: Contemporary issues in Europe. (241-257). London: Routledge.
Pucik, V., & Saba, T. (1998). Selecting and developing the global versus the expatriate manager: A review of the state-of-the-art. Human Resource Planning, 21(4), 40-53.
Punnett, B.J., & Ricks, D.A. (1997). International business. London: Blackwell.
Riusala, K. (2000). Expatriation and careers: Perspectives of expatriates and spouses. Career Development International, l5 (2), 81-90.
Ronen, S. (1989). Training the international assignee. (1st ed.). San Francisco: Goldstein.
Rosenzweig, P.M. (1994). The new ‘American challenge’: Foreign multinationals in the United States. California Management Review, Spring, 107-123.
Sanchez, J.I., Spector, P.E., & Cooper, C. (2000). Adapting to a boundary-less world: A developmental expatriate model. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(2), 96-106.
Scullion, H. (1991). Why Companies prefer to use expatriates. Personnel Management, 23(11), 32-35.
Selmer, J. (2000). Usage of corporate career development activities by expatriate managers and the extent of their international adjustment. International Journal of Commerce and Management, 10 (1), 1-23.
Shaffer, M.A., Harrison, D. A., & Gilley, M.A. (1999). Dimensions, determinants, and differences in the expatriate adjustment process. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 557-559.
Sievers C. (1998). Work/family: Key to a successful assignment. HR Focus, 75(3), 9-11.
Smith D., & Sipika, C. (1993). Back from the brink: Post crisis management. Long Range Planning, 26 (1), 28-38.
Solomon, C.M. (1995). Repatriation: Up, down or out? Personnel Journal, 74(1), 28-36.
Stening, B.W., & Hammer, M.R. (1992). Cultural baggage and the adaption of expatriate American and Japanese managers. Management International Review, 32(1), 77-89.
Stone, R. J. (1994). Human resource management. Sydney: Wiley.
Stroh, L.H., Gregersen, H.B., & Black, J.S. (1998). Closing the gap: Expectations versus reality among repatriates. Journal of World Business, 33(2), 111-124.
Suutari, V., & Brewster, C. (1998). Expatriate management practices and their perceived relevance: Evidence from Finnish Companies. Discussion papers, 247. Vaasa: University of Vaasa.
Swaak, R. (1995). Expatriate failures: Too much cost, too little planning. Compensation and Benefits Review, 27(6), 47-56.
Swaak, R. (1997). Repatriation: A weak link in global HR. HR Focus, 74(4), 2.
Tung, R.L. (1981). Selection and training of personnel for overseas assignments. Columbia Journal of World Business, 16(1), 68-78.
Tung, R. L. (1984). Strategic management of human resource in the multinational enterprise. HR Management, 23 (2), 129-143.
Tung, R.L. (1987). Expatriate assignments: Enhancing success and minimising failure. Academy of Management Executive, 1(2),117-126.
Tung, R.L. (1998a). A Contingency framework of selection and training of expatriates revisited. Human Resource Management Review, 8(1), 23-37.
Tung, R.L. (1998b). American expatriates abroad: From neophytes to cosmopolitans. Journal of World Business, 33(2), 125-144.
Varner, I. (2002). Successful expatriation and organisation strategies. Review of Business, 23(2), 8-12.
Weech, W.A. (2001).Training across cultures. Training and Development, 55(1), 62.
Weitzman, E.A., & Miles, M.B. (1995). User’s Guide for QSR NUD-IST, published by QSR, and on Computer Programs for Qualitative Data Analysis, California: Sage Publication Software Sourcebook.
Who’s Who of Australia (2001). List of Australian organisations. Melbourne: Crown Content Publisher.
Williamson, H. (1991). In harm’s way. HR Magazine, 36 (11),55-60.
Windham International, the National Foreign Trade Council & International human resources (1999). Global Relocation Trends Survey Report.
A year ago I had this crazy idea of experimenting with the final semester of my two-year course. Being an international student in Australia, doing two postgraduate degrees and working at the same time was apparently not enough for me. So instead of choosing to do a professional project and finishing my degree, I decided to do a research project.
If you must know, I literally had no idea of how to do a research project or how to write a thesis. So I went to my professor and told him about my plans to complete a research project for my final semester. “If students imagine completing a research project in three months, I ask them to come and see me. And they later un-imagine it,” came my professor’s reply.
I was then given special permission to take two semesters to finish this research project – and hopefully in a few weeks’ time I will submit my first completed piece of research. In the past few months I have learned a lot of lessons that I want to share, in case you also decide to follow this route without any prior knowledge of how to do a research project!
1. Find the right supervisor
My professor asked a faculty member to become my supervisor. I floated an idea about what area I was interested in working on, and she agreed to keep an eye on me. In terms of a supervisor I couldn’t have asked for anything better. She is patient with me, she knows my shortcomings and she always motivates me even if I am unable to see myself progressing. Having such a supervisor makes this journey very comfortable and easy.
2. Don’t be shy, ask!
I told you earlier that I did not have any clue about how to do a research project. That was my reality and I didn’t try to hide it. I communicated my weakness openly to my supervisor and warned her in advance that I would be asking stupid questions throughout the duration of my project just so I could get an idea of what I was doing. “No question is stupid,” she assured me. The credit indeed goes to her, but it is ultimately your responsibility to communicate with your supervisor and ask as many questions as you need to.
3. Select the right topic
Your topic will determine your project. It should be interesting and it should be something that you really want to investigate. So never rely on others for recommendations about what should be your topic of research. Try to read and think a lot and you will find an area of interest. Explore your inner self, even if it takes time. In a few weeks you will start gathering your thoughts and realize what you actually are interested in researching.
4. Keep your plan realistic
Your topic could be the best in the field, but do you have enough resources to finish the project? Suppose your research project involves travelling halfway around the world to conduct a field investigation. The question you must be asking yourself is: can I afford that much time and money? If not, then no matter how brilliant your idea is, you need to think of something else. Save this one for when you receive a healthy research grant.
5. Prepare a project timeline
Having a project timeline is everything. It keeps you on track all the time. You should have a timeline set out in the first week, stating targets that you must achieve throughout the duration of your research project. Things could go wrong here and there, and you can always adjust dates, but it is very important to have a schedule, ideally broken down further into weekly targets. Ask your supervisor about what kind of targets you should set and try to achieve these on a weekly basis. Doing this should help you avoid becoming overwhelmed.
6. Write, write and write
If you’re unsure how to write a thesis, the best advice I can give is not to leave the writing stage until last. Start writing from day one. This is something I learned the hard way. My supervisor always suggests writing, but I don’t feel comfortable doing that unless I have all the information in hand. However, I’ve learned how important it is to write down whatever you do, and make notes of whatever you read. Documenting the whole process as you go will help you finalize the project in a very effective way. So don’t worry about writing things that are “wrong” or that don’t make sense. Remember, it only has to make sense once the whole project is finished. So even if it seems raw, keep on writing and get regular feedback from your supervisor.
These are some general rules that apply to every research project. You will definitely have to alter a few things here and there depending on your area of interest and your topic. I wish you good luck for this. And if you need to talk to me, don’t hesitate to leave a comment below. Finally, remember that persistence is the key. You may feel like giving up when things go off track, but stick with it and you’ll not only emerge with a completed project, you’ll also gain lots of invaluable skills along the way.
Want more content like this?Register for free site membership to get regular updates and your own personal content feed.